Dating RIP? NY Times says now it's just hooking up.

This week, the New York Times posted an obituary to dating, (well an opinon piece) called: "The Demise of Dating." I think Mr. Blow (what an unfortunate name for someone writing an essay about hookups!) is definitely on to a trend that is not just sweeping teens and the Generation Y, but has pretty much infected our relationships ever since the dawn of the Craigslist hook up ad.



By CHARLES M. BLOW

The paradigm has shifted. Dating is dated. Hooking up is here to stay.

(For those over 30 years old: hooking up is a casual sexual encounter with no expectation of future emotional commitment. Think of it as a one-night stand with someone you know.)

According to a report released this spring by Child Trends, a Washington research group, there are now more high school seniors saying that they never date than seniors who say that they date frequently. Apparently, it’s all about the hookup.

When I first heard about hooking up years ago, I figured that it was a fad that would soon fizzle. I was wrong. It seems to be becoming the norm.

I should point out that just because more young people seem to be hooking up instead of dating doesn’t mean that they’re having more sex (they’ve been having less, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) or having sex with strangers (they’re more likely to hook up with a friend, according to a 2006 paper in the Journal of Adolescent Research).

To help me understand this phenomenon, I called Kathleen Bogle, a professor at La Salle University in Philadelphia who has studied hooking up among college students and is the author of the 2008 book, “Hooking Up: Sex, Dating and Relationships on Campus.”

It turns out that everything is the opposite of what I remember. Under the old model, you dated a few times and, if you really liked the person, you might consider having sex. Under the new model, you hook up a few times and, if you really like the person, you might consider going on a date.

I asked her to explain the pros and cons of this strange culture. According to her, the pros are that hooking up emphasizes group friendships over the one-pair model of dating, and, therefore, removes the negative stigma from those who can’t get a date. As she put it, “It used to be that if you couldn’t get a date, you were a loser.” Now, she said, you just hang out with your friends and hope that something happens.

The cons center on the issues of gender inequity. Girls get tired of hooking up because they want it to lead to a relationship (the guys don’t), and, as they get older, they start to realize that it’s not a good way to find a spouse. Also, there’s an increased likelihood of sexual assaults because hooking up is often fueled by alcohol.

That’s not good. So why is there an increase in hooking up? According to Professor Bogle, it’s: the collapse of advanced planning, lopsided gender ratios on campus, delaying marriage, relaxing values and sheer momentum.

It used to be that “you were trained your whole life to date,” said Ms. Bogle. “Now we’ve lost that ability — the ability to just ask someone out and get to know them.”

Now that’s sad.

E-mail chblow@nytimes.com

4 comments:

Caseydilla said...

I am completely in agreement and disagreement! I think it makes things more difficult. I am 23 yrs old and apparently, in order to get a man to consider a relationship anymore, is to "hook-up" and then see what happens. So it's almost like you're no longer being judged on personality or even looks, just by your sexual abilities. Talk about making someone feel insecure!!!

Anonymous said...

Could it be because everyone is so insanely hungry for love and validation in our fractured society? A natural outgrowth of double-income families, relatives scattered all over the country, extended family in nursing homes, and a propensity for "quality" not "quantity" time with family, lovers and friends? Are people misguidedly seeking a spiritual connection and a feeling that there is something bigger than themselves with casual sex instead of emotional intimacy? Do they have no models of emotional intimacy to follow? Is emotional intimacy dead?

Clever Elsie said...

Honestly? I don't think it's as deep as that. I think young guys want no-strings sex, and girls have been convinced that they should want it, too, that if they don't, they're "prudes." A lot of young girls, unfortunately, are more concerned with getting a guy to love them than they are with loving themselves, so they put up with this treatment, desperately hoping that it will lead to more.

As men get older, many learn to value women as people, not just sex objects, and begin to desire an emotional connection and commitment. They aren't emotionally devastated by all those years of hooking up because they weren't the ones getting emotionally attached. Instead, it's the women who pay the greatest price, taking the emotional (and sometimes physical) burden of casual sex on their own shoulders. By the time men get around to committing, many of them are jaded and cold, clingy and insecure, or just complete basket cases from years of emotional abuse.

Anonymous said...

With the advent of birth control, both men and women are now able to exercise their right of sexual independence. We should celebrate this!

I think the only people against freedom of sexual expression are those that can't score any. There are many products out there to help guys and girls adapt to this new "hooking up" culture (thank you capitalism). They even have an application on the iPhone called iSeduce that they sell for only $2. Check it out here: itunes.com/app/iseduce.

Craziness! I hope everyone can enjoy and relish this new culture. There are no more players and sluts. Just people having fun. Life is short!

Post a Comment

Let us know what you think!