Shut up and let him drive



The other day I reunited with an old flame. We haven't seen each other, physically, for at least seven years. He took me to lunch at a Chinese restaurant.

At first I was shocked to see how he'd gone from dark hair to gray. But what was more jarring was how he'd mellowed out -- from a trendy mysterious bad boy full of hubris, ego and attitude, to a stable father, a responsible, caring, loving adult.

Having a child cracked his once guarded heart wide open.

Last time we were together, I was a hard driving corporate executive and focused most of my energy on my career and acquiring stuff, including a house worth almost a million dollars. I was living an inauthentic life that was about materialism and doing the things society tell you to do, rather than following my heart.

I was stuck deep in my masculine, and it was turning men off.

Like most women, I longed so much to be in love, to surrender to love, but something inside me didn't trust that a man would ever be able to provide and take care of me. Basically, I was trapped in the lonely paradox of modern feminism -- the modern myth that I was better off on my own than wasting any time daydreaming that some knight on a white horse would scoop me up and whisk me away to a happy family and a picket fence.

I always wondered, "wasn't there something in between these extremes? A partnership where a man and woman could team up and co-create a business or work of art together? Why did the woman always get stuck in backseat, as the woman behind the man.

There was a powerful attraction from the minute we met -- and I ran from it because a lot of the things he was into at that time (from alternative music to astrology and metaphysics) were just way too out there for me to understand. I took off on a trip overseas for the summer.

While I was gone, he married the next woman he met -- and not long after that, here was one of the baddest bad boys I've ever known, holding down a corporate executive job, raising a child, and buying a house.

For most of those 7 years, I've been in and out of relationships. One lasted a few years and we got engaged. But the relationships that followed were painful, hurtful and even abusive experiences that left me with thick layers of scar tissue and an ever-growing distrust of men.

Seeking the love inside that I wasn't finding outside, I delved deep into a spiritual journey that has involved tantric healing work, workshops and therapy, shamanic journeying, the artistic underground, yoga, meditation, raw food... I focused on the external too--paying thousands of dollars for skin treatments and the best hairstylists, new clothes and makeup.

I went way out on the edge, just about as far as you can go in search of erradicating whatever it was inside me that was making me so unlovable. Little did I know that it was my aggressive, competitive inner masculine that was turning the guys off. Once all about material striving and black pinstripe suits, I dove deep into the murky waters of the sacred feminine mysteries.

I started dressing like a goddess. I learned to dance, sing, perform, give a massage, move energy, surrender to bliss. Some people called me a Dakini. Some people thought I'd lost my mind. But sometimes you have to get lost in order to find yourself.

As I sat across the table over lunch, he cracked open a fortune cookie.

It said: "A good friend is the best mirror."

It struck me as painfully ironic -- now, here we were, 7 years later - strangely closer to each other and with more common ground than we had when the journey began. My rock found a kite, and started to fly. His kite found a rock, and became more stable.

Sadly, his marriage was destroyed, to a large extent, by his wife's ardent feminism and controlling behavior -- which included her insisting on driving all the time, working while he stayed home and cared for the kid as a house husband, competing as an athlete, and finally, spending most of her free time on a spiritual path that severed their last thread of common ground.

We might also say that perhaps my friend also lost his core masculine essence as he took on the feminine role, and that his wife overcompensated with her growing masculinity and competitiveness.

It is especially ironic that such a physically large and strong man, a man who is like the very essence of masculine, ended up so "pussy whipped". And it's ironic that a woman would knowingly choose a radical iconoclast as her partner and then try to suck the life out of him and turn him into a striving conformist.

The other day I wrote to him:

"I think it is very sad that women so often cage the wild creature they were first attracted to. And then once they have him in their lair, subdued, emasculated, slaving away to the domicile, firmly tied to the bed with velvet ropes, they start complaining: "What happened to the man I fell in love with?""

He wrote back: "I am pinching myself."

As a hard driving career chick who was comfortable in the company of Ivy league CEOs and sitting in board meetings, I lived in the world of men all day long. In relationship, I tended to choose very soft, physically small and efeminite men, or men with long flowing hair, earrings and peacock wardrobes.

Often I picked men who were weaker than me financially. I didn't see that my own feminine defecit was forcing me to be with feminized men in order to find that natural yin/yang balance that all relationships seek (including gay ones). For example, there's usually a "butch" and a "femme" in most lesbian partnerships, and a more financially or sexually dominant and submissive partner in gay male couples.

Now that my journey had softened me up, healed the wounds that made me mistrust and thus need to control men, made me more comfortable with my divine feminine essence, I could relate more to the wisdom in allowing the yin/yang of masculine / feminine polarity take over -- much as Ginger Rogers let Fred Astaire lead her in the dance.

"I did everything he did," Ginger said, "Only backwards and in heels." If Ginger didn't follow so gracefully, she wouldn't be supporting Fred, and neither of them would succeed in the dance.

I was feeling more comfortable with the idea of being with a masculine, powerful man, and letting him set the pace of the relationship, letting him pursue and lead. And with the idea, eventually, of relinquishing my lonely independence and allowing myself to be interdependent someday.

Writer and relationship guru David Deida talks about striving, ideally, for "interdependent" (rather
than co-dependent) relationship between men and women, and the balance
of masculine / feminine energy. Interdependent relationships the next step in the evolution of relationship. Deida says they are extremely rare.

Along that theme, Laura Doyle wrote a controversial book, "The Surrendered Wife" a few years ago that advises women to let go, become more feminine, and let the man drive, make the financial decisions and take charge.

I'm looking forward to relaxing and seeing where that takes me on the road to the interdependent relationship that I know I'll find someday, if I can just learn how to shut up, surrender and let him drive.

5 comments:

The Singlutionary said...

I really appreciate this post because I have the same complicated feelings about the masculine and feminine in myself. I'd like to continue being who I am (a pretty good mix of masculine and feminine which is perhaps more masculine than most women) and have a relationship with someone that is truly interdependent (instead of co dependent). For women like me "letting someone drive" doesn't mean letting him take over my life. I still don't believe in traditional gender roles, etc. But I do get now that there has to be a give and a take. I can't be doing everything for the relationship in the same way I do everything for my house or for my car. Because then there is no space for the other person to contribute. I wore myself out trying to run romance like I ran other aspects of my life. I tried to be perfect at it and take the bull by the horns and figure out a way to make it work. So, I get that any relationship needs to have more balance, more sit back and let things take place.

You write: the modern myth that I was better off on my own than wasting any time daydreaming that some knight on a white horse would scoop me up and whisk me away to a happy family and a picket fence.

I write about living a full life with or without a relationship and not waiting for the man on his white horse. I am sure that the man on his white horse is most likely to come into my life when I least expect it and when I am fully living my own life on my own horse of sorts. But fully living my own life means following my dreams which is what you are doing!

Love Shopper said...

Thanks for your thoughtful response. I don't believe that we have to be "self actualized" or "complete" or evolved or anything at all in order to be worthy of love. I think that this idea that we don't need anyone is one of those independence myths in our culture of loneliness that ends up making people so separate and alienated. I think the real answer is learning how to live a full life WITHIN a relationship -- respecting and honoring the differences, respecting and honoring each other's need for autonomy and independence within the partnership, not controlling or manipulating each other.

Few of us seem ready for such a mature and evolved relationship, but I see it happening more and more often.

Anonymous said...

Great post. However I'm small, gentle, quiet and submissive but find that most men want Alpha females, no matter whether they're Alpha or more feminine themselves. My trust in men has died - so it's good to hear that you got yours back. I also agree with the comment above - we don't need to be "whole" before we find a relationship, there are plenty of messed up people loving each other. And I think "independence" is a dangerous myth in our society that has led to our record levels of depression. Sure, be able to support yourself, but not at the expense of connecting with other human beings. This is also a timely post as I work in the corporate world and despise having to fit in with men's way of being. You've reminded me that I need to escape.

Clever Elsie said...

My feelings on this issue are complex and hard to sum up. Research shows that, on almost any given trait, there are more differences between members of the same sex than between an average member of either sex. I hesitate to stereotype certain behaviors or personality traits as "masculine" and "feminine" rather than "human" because we all have the capacity to desire the same things, feel the same emotions, act or react in the same ways. Some individuals, due to their own hormonal makeup, brain structure, value system, childhood experiences, etc. naturally gravitate toward certain occupations, interests, mannerisms, or attire that some would consider more typical of the opposite sex. But who am I to tell those people that they shouldn't be who they are because it's not "masculine" or "feminine" enough? In addition, I truly believe that there is someone out there for everyone. Not every woman likes the strong, silent alpha male, and not every man wants a girly girl.

That said, I think many of us are naturally inclined toward gender roles that are traditional, and there's nothing wrong with that. In fact, it unnerves me how the feminist movement has publicly flogged women for being traditionally feminine and males for being traditionally masculine. We have basic physiological differences that often translate into different predilections in life, and that is and should be OKAY. Just like Anonymous above, I too have noticed that more and more men, under the spell of radical feminism, have begun to expect and desire that their partners exhibit a lot of traditionally masculine traits. As I put it, they want men with vaginas! Personally, I am a more traditionally feminine person, and a lot of the guys I've dated have wished I was more into adventure sports or earned a bigger paycheck or was more "independent" when walking alone at night. I think that's a direct result of feminism, and it really bothers me because it's taken away my right to be who I am.

When it comes to romantic relationships, though, I really believe that we as a society place too much emphasis on finding one other person to "complete" us. It's not that I believe we need to be die-hard individualists or self-constructed islands. On the contrary, we're social beings, and I firmly believe that we need relationships. But I just don't believe (and research doesn't show) that those relationships must be romantic in order for us to be happy and healthy. I think it's normal for many people to want romantic relationships, but the way many of us disappear into those relationships today is not healthy. Today's standard nuclear family is a pale shadow of our historically rich extended families and communities, and I think we don't do ourselves any favors when we make the spousal relationship the be-all and end-all of our relationships. We spend more of our adult lives single than coupled, and it's just not psychologically healthy to spend the majority of one's life idealizing and pining for one person who may never even come into our lives. Are we then going to feel like failures or cease to enjoy life because that one person didn't present him- or herself? And if we meet that person, but he or she disappoints us at some time, as all people invariably do, are we then going to be crushed? I think we need to recognize that we can get sustenance from a lot of different kinds of relationships and that the romantic relationship is just one possible outlet.

Love Shopper said...

I love the way you state this: "I just don't believe (and research doesn't show) that those relationships must be romantic in order for us to be happy and healthy. I think it's normal for many people to want romantic relationships, but the way many of us disappear into those relationships today is not healthy."

Yes, couples do disappear, into their own little world, into each other, into their children, and I can't tell you how many dear friends I've "lost" to marriage. (Or lost while I was in a relationship with a man who didn't like my friends, or was antisocial, or simply lived too far from them.)

But, speaking for myself, I am happiest when I have a deep, intimate, sexual relationship in my life, and even though the months and years I've spent alone on this earth far outnumber the ones I've spent in the arms of a loved one, I still continue to believe that this kind of relationship is possible--and that I am worthy of it, JUST THE WAY I AM.

Everyone deserves love and is worthy of love. The sooner we get rid of our societal programming and brainwashing (that says we need a boob job, hair transplant, diet, exercise program, new car or whatever in order to be lovable) the sooner we'll all be able to accept and see the beauty in each other.


.

Post a Comment

Let us know what you think!